Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 9:21:38 GMT
o analyze the Superior Court of Justice's decision to release her. I was the rapporteur and stated my position: whether the Court of Justice and the STJ were right or wrong in granting the HC is not the council's problem. For this, there are degrees of Justice. The CNJ only has to see if there was any external fact that led to such a decision. In this case, there was nothing. We have already had more than 60 cases of people asking us to reform judges' decisions, simply because they consider them unfair. ConJur — It looks like they are creating a new instance, then. Alexandre de Moraes — But that is not the constitutional.
role of the Council. Furthermore, it would be pointless to create yet another instance. I have warned counselors about the danger of abbreviating jurisdiction directly to the Federal Supreme Court, because our decisions can only be appealed to the Supreme Court. Then, the person files a lawsuit with the CNJ, and then goes straight to the STF. ConJur — Which area is the greatest demand Phone Number List ? Alexandre de Moraes — Numerically, the biggest demand is disciplinary. But these issues take time to resolve, because all the investigation has to be done. But the most important thing for the council to establish is the macro issues, which involve everyone in the courts, such as nepotism and the promotion of judges.
ConJur — And how is the issue of nepotism in the Judiciary today? In addition to the council's resolution, there was already older legislation prohibiting it, right? Alexandre de Moraes — There is federal legislation from 1996 that applies to federal courts. But, at the time of this law, the courts understood that they could no longer hire relatives, but they did not need to dismiss those who had been hired until 1995. They understood that it was a perfect legal act, and did not need to be changed. Some states also have legislation, such as São Paulo. In Goiás, the legislation that deals with nepotism is absolutely immoral. She says it can be up to two relatives.
role of the Council. Furthermore, it would be pointless to create yet another instance. I have warned counselors about the danger of abbreviating jurisdiction directly to the Federal Supreme Court, because our decisions can only be appealed to the Supreme Court. Then, the person files a lawsuit with the CNJ, and then goes straight to the STF. ConJur — Which area is the greatest demand Phone Number List ? Alexandre de Moraes — Numerically, the biggest demand is disciplinary. But these issues take time to resolve, because all the investigation has to be done. But the most important thing for the council to establish is the macro issues, which involve everyone in the courts, such as nepotism and the promotion of judges.
ConJur — And how is the issue of nepotism in the Judiciary today? In addition to the council's resolution, there was already older legislation prohibiting it, right? Alexandre de Moraes — There is federal legislation from 1996 that applies to federal courts. But, at the time of this law, the courts understood that they could no longer hire relatives, but they did not need to dismiss those who had been hired until 1995. They understood that it was a perfect legal act, and did not need to be changed. Some states also have legislation, such as São Paulo. In Goiás, the legislation that deals with nepotism is absolutely immoral. She says it can be up to two relatives.